Director:
Quentin Tarantino
Starring:
Uma Thurman
David Carradine
Michael Madsen
Daryl Hannah
Gordon Liu
Perla Haney-Jardine
Release: 16 Apr. 04
IMDb
|
Kill Bill:
Vol. 2
BY: DAVID PERRY
There are two sides to Quentin Tarantino: the overbearing
film geek and the thoughtful dodger. In person, neither is particularly
tolerable, but when allowed to seep into his art, they take on a personality
their own. Even if the thoughtful side has been long dormant (making its
stunning debut in Jackie Brown), their marriage in Kill Bill: Vol. 2
complements a career built around being the most annoying personality in
Hollywood. The Kill Bill films, like their creator, are pure dissonance, but
they seem to make the finest symphony out of false notes.
Again, this is the work of a man obsessed with the films he’s seen and given
the chance to make fairly big-budget films to remind audiences of them. He
doesn’t care that most of the people who see Kill Bill: Vol. 2 won’t get the
Shogun Assassin reference –- he gets it, which is all that matters. His
reverence for cinematic history, or at least the segments he fetishizes, is
uniquely profound in its coolness. Tarantino is a selfish man who wants us
to catch up to his level of cinephelia, and doesn’t care if we are left
behind. I find it fitting that he originally considered playing the role of
Pai Mei, a sadistic kung-fu coach who leaves his subjects to painfully toil
as they attempt to reach his level of artistry.
Personality is an attribute I cherish in films, which may be why I’m a
sucker for Tarantino’s complete oeuvre of half-assed meditations on
Hollywood and Asian (and, now, Italian) pop cultural, especially the violent
conventions. If I were to make a feature film –- a scary day in filmmaking,
to say the least –- it would likely be overburdened with French New Wave
references and impenetrable pretensions. Importantly, I would love the film,
and likely not worry about how others felt.
Of course, my hypothetical movie wouldn’t be good because it wouldn’t have
the same grasp of personality-as-fiction that Tarantino has perfected. He’s
not a violent person (other than his impromptu boxing years ago), but he is
the lover and the purveyor of its beauty. To some, the violence he shows is
abhorrent and overblown. Yet, the extreme style is what sets him apart from
a truly sadistic filmmaker like Michael Haneke, Lars von Trier, or Takeshi
Miike. Tarantino would likely bow at their feet, which wondering how to
exploit their genius for his own personal pleasure.
Kill Bill: Vol. 2, despite coming with intended victims, one more than in
the previous film, is a much less violent movie, yet no less cruel. Again,
he’s practicing the motions of his heroes –- Ennio Morricone is now his
greatest obsession –- while not sparing the audience of the showmanship.
Cruelty, he shows, isn’t just watching a person die, but also arguing why
the death doesn’t matter. I won’t divulge the total body count here, but it
is fractional compared to the first film. And yet, unlike there, Tarantino
allows the audience to care about The Bride’s (Thurman) intended victims,
including the somber Budd (Madsen) and the elegiac Bill (Carradine; he’s the
John Travolta/Robert Forster for these films, delivering amazing work after
a career of marginal roles). Their likely demise is troublesome, even when
they again hurt The Bride. When Tarantino giddily reminds the audience of
their presence in the films during the concluding picture credits (perhaps
the finest closure to a film in years, needed considering how long-winded
these two works have been), they’re tough to deal with because Tarantino has
given them more dimensions than his revengeful heroine.
Being meditative isn’t his style, though, which may be why the film’s pat,
playful ending feels so right. Even when the film’s been a rollercoaster of
emotions (who thought that would even be said of a Tarantino film), the
landing pattern is still one of braggart arrogance by an entertainer. Even
if he’s just entertaining himself, the masturbatory motions of the Kill Bill
films are no less engaging than much of the source material he’s lifted. I
feel I know Quentin Tarantino better from watching these films –- which, for
better or worse, I could never say from the Shaw brothers or Morricone.
|